Len Conrad wrote: >> [snip] > I changed the file to vscan:vscan, su'd to vscan and command line > spamassassin returned: > > Content analysis details: (6.8 points, 5.0 required)
what tests where hit? also, what results do you see if you reinject the message into amavisd-new? it is possible that this now yields the same score (scores change over time because new IPs and URIs get listed in various DNS based lists, the message may be now be caught by Razor and the like, ... etc). > > spamc -c running as vscan returns: > > $ spamc -c < /home/harry/declude/20080729/70537530.eml > 10.2/5.0 > As Clifton said, this is different from spamassassin command result. BTW, why are you running spamd if you're already having amavisd? if it's for testing, it's ok. otherwise, >[snip] > > we have local.cf with bayes_auto_learn 1, but I can' see we have > auto-whitelisting configged anywhere. v310.pre contains: loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AWL comment it out until you feel more confortable. AWL is hard to get right. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
