Terry,

Indeed, the dollar volume is the way to assess liquidity.
I just haven't spent enough time to come up with some kind of equation
which measures the "bottom-line" of dollar-value.

Say you want to have at least $6 closing price and 400,000 shares
traded a previous day.  That's $2,400,000 dollar-value.  This means
you could be looking at an $80 stock with volume of only 30,000.

It is debatable but I wouldn't like to buy stocks with such a low
volume.  On the other hand, $6 with 400,000 shares traded is OK, in my
scope.

intermilan04

--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Terry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Think about using Dollar Volume and not just Volume. There are some $2
> stocks that trade multi-millions of shares daily so buying 900 isn't a
> problem. Conversely, I imagine there are $100 stocks that don't have
> much volume, but buying $5000 worth only requires 50 shares.
> 
> Also, do you have a database that contains all the extinct stocks (the
> ones that went out of business)? If not, then you are getting
> survivorship bias in your back-testing. Same with actual prices IF you
> have a price limit in your backtest. Note that Cicso shows up as an 8
> cent stock in 1990 in split-adjusted databases (which is most of them).
> The actual price of CSCO in 1990 was $24.
> --
> Terry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amibroker@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of intermilan04
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 18:56
> To: amibroker@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: Backtest vs Forwardtest
> 
> Fred,
> 
> I believe my case was the latter.  Today I was trying to buy 900
> shares of a 5-dollar stock and got caught.  I am now making change to
> my volume limit so I won't make this mistake again.
> 
> intermilan04
> 
> --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <ftonetti@> wrote:
> >
> > If your trades are actually affecting market price then you either 
> > have more money then you need ... or ... you are trading issues that 
> > aren't very liquid.
> > 
> > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "intermilan04" <intermilan04@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > dingo,
> > > 
> > > One issue is:
> > > - Fantastic backtest, relatively poor forward test results
> > > 
> > > Another issue is:
> > > - When I follow my system, I get bad pricing because sometimes 
> > stocks
> > > gap up due to my order being placed overnight
> > > 
> > > These are two separate issues.
> > > Of course, the question is how do you actually follow your own 
> > system
> > > if following it ends up influencing the market against you.  It 
> > sounds
> > > like a Zen question so I put it aside for now and focus on the first
> > > issue.
> > > 
> > > intermilan04
> > > 
> > > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "dingo" <dingo@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As far as "this is a whole another issue" - I seriously doubt 
> > that's the
> > > > case.  Sounds like the same general problem to me.
> > > > 
> > > > Download IO.zip and read thru the docs and see if any of that 
> > makes
> > > sense to
> > > > you...
> > > > 
> > > > d  
> > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: amibroker@yahoogroups.com 
> > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of intermilan04
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 7:32 PM
> > > > > To: amibroker@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Backtest vs Forwardtest
> > > > > 
> > > > > I wish I was making 75% up to now :-)
> > > > > The 75% is the result of my system which is optimized between 
> > > > > 2001-2006.  Since I'm always trying to improve my system, I 
> > > > > don't necessarily have traded with the system verbatim from 
> > 2006/1/1.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Now I am having an issue where as soon as I start using a 
> > > > > system its performance drops :-D  but this is a whole another 
> > > > > issue so I didn't mention about it here.
> > > > > 
> > > > > intermilan04
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "sebastiandanconia"
> > > > > <sebastiandanconia@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nope, I just meant that he measured all the other years from 
> > > > > > Jan.1-Jan.1, so he's not comparing apples to apples by 
> > > > > looking at YTD 
> > > > > > performance.  We're coming into a time of year when there are 
> > > > > > typically major drops followed by major rallies, so if his 
> > system 
> > > > > > captures that behavior it could make up for its miserable 
> > > > > 75% profit 
> > > > > > up until now.:)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I hear you about real DD's that exceed that of tested 
> > > > > methods.  That's 
> > > > > > why I think it's so important to understand why a system 
> > > > > works, beyond 
> > > > > > simply the fact that it's tested-out well, which could just 
> > be a 
> > > > > > mathematical coincidence, a meaningless correlation without 
> > any 
> > > > > > cause-and-effect relationship.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Luck,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Sebastian
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <ftonetti@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "So, two things: First, the obvious one, you can't really 
> > > > > know that 
> > > > > > > your system has "broken down" until you get the final 
> > results on 
> > > > > > > January 1, 2007.:)"
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Really ? ... You mean there is no point at which real DD's 
> > exceed 
> > > > > > > previous experience you wouldn't think that system is 
> > broken ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please note that this group is for discussion between users 
> > only.
> > > > > 
> > > > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly 
> > > > > to SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > > > > 
> > > > > For other support material please check also:
> > > > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > > > > 
> > > > >  
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --
> > > > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > > > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/433 - Release 
> > > > > Date: 8/30/2006
> > > > >  
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
> 
> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> 
> For other support material please check also:
> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>






Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.

To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to