Hello,
Same behavior, but only if the taskbar is at the top of the screen. Strange, but I can live with Patrick De : amibroker@yahoogroups.com [mailto:amibro...@yahoogroups.com] De la part de Yuki Taga Envoyé : mercredi 14 juillet 2010 10:41 À : amibroker@yahoogroups.com Objet : [amibroker] OT: One Windows 7 oddity For the most part, I'm very pleased with 7. But there is one oddity that I'd like to know if anyone else experiences. Hover the pointer over the "Show hidden icons" arrow in the system tray. I find two different behaviors. Imagine a horizontal line perfectly bisecting the arrow (and the box around it that is revealed when you hover). If the cursor is as much as one pixel above that line, even though it is on the arrow and in the box, there is a flashing of the "Show hidden icons" title, and the click is not 100 percent sure -- sometimes it has to be repeated. But if the pointer is just one pixel below that imaginary center line, there is no flashing at all, and the click works 100 percent. To be sure, my experience is that you can be well below the arrow, even below the revealed box, and make this work just fine. You can hover at the very bottom of the taskbar under the arrow (but within the horizontal confines of that revealed box), and it works like a charm. You can also be way over the arrow (and well above the box) and you will get the flashing and some hit or miss clicking results. For me, a click only about one pixel above the bottom of the taskbar, but within the horizontal confines of that revealed box, will show hidden icon. All that is necessary is to be in an area where the box illuminates. But if you are one pixel above the center of that area (dead over the arrow, but just above an imaginary center), you get the flashing. Anyone else? It seems that the true target area for displaying hidden tray icons is a box beginning one pixel below the center of that area, extending down to the very first pixel at the bottom of the taskbar within the horizontal bounds. Hard to believe this passed muster. Best,