> From: g0...@aol.com
> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 15:45:36 -0500
> To: clintbradf...@mac.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 - Dumb Question
>
>
> In a message dated 09/02/2011 06:08:45 GMT Standard Time,
> clintbradf...@mac.com writes:
>
> >> ... Clint. When ARISSAT is released it will stay in the "Plane" of ISS
> orbit...they will toss it retrograde meaning in the opposite direction of
> the velocity vector and with its slightly lower velocity the orbit will
> start to decrease...this is done so that very quickly the orbits will stop
> being "prox ops" reasonably fast.
>
> Great, succinct info - MANY thanks!
>
> Clint, K6LCS
>
>
>
>
>
> Hmm. This is a bit of a brain teaser...
>
> So if the satellite is deployed towards the rear of the ISS, it's velocity
> will be slightly lower.
> So does that mean it will go to a lower orbit- (Same as firing retros to
> reenter)?
>
> If so, then I believe as the orbit altitude is reduced, the apparent
> velocity increases.....(??) which will cause ARISsat-1 to 'move ahead' of the
>
> ISS over a few hours
>
> But didn't we say the velocity would be less than the ISS due to the method
> of deploying it against the velocity vector ?
>
> Time for me to have a Tuna sandwich. We all know it's probably full of
> Dolphin...and they are really clever.
>
> David G0MRF
>
Interesting puzzler, eh? From what I have read in the past, I think this their
logic.
What they are trying to do is to separate the orbits of the ISS and ARISSat as
quickly as possible, to avoid the potential for a collision. Consider the
options:
1. Throw it sideways to the ISS orbit. The result is that twice per orbit the
two spacecraft's paths will cross, side to side. Bad idea.
2. Throw it ahead of the ISS (faster orbit speed). This will raise the orbit,
slightly, and also make it a bit elliptical (up and down). The higher orbit
makes the satellite go behind the ISS, but the elliptical shape also means that
the orbits will cross every orbit (but out of phase, so they won't be at the
same place when they do). But, then as the ARISSat orbit decays, they will get
closer and closer, potentially getting back to the same place. Not good,
either.
3. Throw it behind the ISS (slower orbit). As you note, this will lower the
orbit (and make it a bit elliptical), and initially the apogee of the orbit
will intersect that of the ISS. Being in a lower orbit, ARISSat will move
ahead of the ISS, and over time, as the ARISSat orbit decays, the two will
diverge even farther. So, this is the safest.
At least, I think that's the logic. If not, pass me some of that tuna...
Greg KO6TH
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
