Hi Greg,
Sorry to say this, but your analogy to "just another component"
is plain wrong. The vocoder cannot be replaced by another generic
component as far as I can ascertain. I cant' even find the algorithms
that would allow me to program a DSPIC or fpga at home in my meager lab
to perform any of the functions in the codec.
If they are available (I have searched the US patent office records and
came up with nothing of substance) please point me to the information
that I could use to produce my own version for "one off, private use,
that a competent artisan could make" from the patent office application.
Taken from your own patent office's requirements for a patent to be granted.
I'm certainly not against using modern technology in ham radio, but if
it is to be used, all aspects of the technology should be on public
display, so any one "could":
1: Understand how the technology worked
2: Attempt to build something or code something that would enable them
to communicate using the technique.
3: Advance the "art" by understanding and may be even using the latest
techniques.
I have no problems with the use of "digital" systems on the ham bands, I
use FLDIGI for receiving all sorts of signals, and have modified the
open source code (waterfall) for a totally different interest.
I could do this because the information was freely available.
On another, probably more contentious, issue that you raised you
mentioned that of operating systems! and choices.
As you so correctly pointed out most people don't care, and probably
wouldn't even know what system was giving them their internet access or
email or poetry writing ability or photo sharing or.....
Isn't ham radio a little different?
Are we not interested in the nuances of the closed source versus open
source systems that we may choose to use?
I certainly know where my interest is, and it is most certainly not in
closed source systems.
Want to know a recent reason why closed source software is a
REALLY,REALLY bad idea? Try Googling Stuxnet and then follow the leads
from there.
Really scary, if you live in a country that uses an internet based
control system...USA,GB, France, Italy, Germany,etc
Open source, or at least scrutiny would have identified the stupidity of
global passwords and non changing access passwords!
Another point that you inferred (and I could be wrong here) that we
should accept and use commercial systems (DSTAR?) because they are
available and are being pushed (hard) by one....ONE ONLY... manufacturer
, well I don't subscribe to that mindset.
I fully understand that JARL instigated this system for their own
reasons, but I fail to see why the rest of the world should be captive
to a system that has to use closed source components to function.
Which is where we started I think.
Cheers and (open source wishes!)
Don
ZL1THO.
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
