#22 likes it. I think it'd be neat to compare the rankings to latitude as well. 
My station has run almost full time collecting telemetry since launch, and I 
continue to slide down the list. I'm not upset or even bothered by it, but it 
illustrates how much more access time a high latitude station gets on a polar 
orbit as compared to say, a 28.3 degree latitude location. 

Competition has probably doubled the participation in this endeavor, which only 
helps the project. Plus, if it doesn't hurt anyone, why even care? Much better 
things to get tweaked about.

73, Drew KO4MA


-----Original Message-----
>From: David Johnson <d...@thejohnsonsonline.net>
>Sent: Feb 20, 2014 4:10 PM
>To: "Bill Bordy, NJ1H " <n...@comcast.net>, Amsat - BBs <amsat-bb@amsat.org>, 
>eu_am...@yahoogroups.co.uk
>Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FUNcube Warehouse Upload Ranking Changes
>
>Hi,
>
>It took 40 minutes to write the code of the train on the way to work 
>this morning and was
>an interesting challenge and the Google Analytics spiked as soon as I 
>released and and announced it.
>
>So I'm happy with it, as are the the FUNcube team. One of those asking 
>for it, is part of the team.
>
>73
>
>Dave, G4DPZ
>FUNcube Warehouse Developer
>
>On 20/02/2014 19:57, Bill Bordy, NJ1H wrote:
>> I need to do a sanity check of my reaction to the below. I took a deep 
>> breath and waited awhile before sending this email
>>
>> Am I the only one wondering why any user felt the need to have a 
>> column showing rankings added?
>>
>> 73,
>> Bill
>> NJ1H
>>
>>
>> On 2/20/2014 11:40 AM, David A B Johnson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> At the request of several users we have added another column to the 
>>> page which enumerates the position in the ranking as well as the 
>>> number of uploads.
>>>
>>> http://warehouse.funcube.org.uk/ranking.html?satelliteId=2
>>>
>>> Current range is 1 – 536
>>>
>>> 73
>>>
>>> Dave, G4DPZ
>>>
>>> FUNcube Team Member
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
>>> program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to