No 93......must try harder must try harder.
-----Original Message----- From: David Johnson <d...@thejohnsonsonline.net> To: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbren...@mindspring.com>; Amsat - BBs <amsat-bb@amsat.org> Sent: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 21:43 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FUNcube Warehouse Upload Ranking Changes Hi, Oooh, that sound like a challenge for another train journey :-) Thanks Drew. 73 - Dave On 20/02/2014 21:32, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote: > #22 likes it. I think it'd be neat to compare the rankings to latitude as well. My station has run almost full time collecting telemetry since launch, and I continue to slide down the list. I'm not upset or even bothered by it, but it illustrates how much more access time a high latitude station gets on a polar orbit as compared to say, a 28.3 degree latitude location. > > Competition has probably doubled the participation in this endeavor, which only helps the project. Plus, if it doesn't hurt anyone, why even care? Much better things to get tweaked about. > > 73, Drew KO4MA > > > -----Original Message----- >> From: David Johnson <d...@thejohnsonsonline.net> >> Sent: Feb 20, 2014 4:10 PM >> To: "Bill Bordy, NJ1H " <n...@comcast.net>, Amsat - BBs >> <amsat-bb@amsat.org>, eu_am...@yahoogroups.co.uk >> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FUNcube Warehouse Upload Ranking Changes >> >> Hi, >> >> It took 40 minutes to write the code of the train on the way to work >> this morning and was >> an interesting challenge and the Google Analytics spiked as soon as I >> released and and announced it. >> >> So I'm happy with it, as are the the FUNcube team. One of those asking >> for it, is part of the team. >> >> 73 >> >> Dave, G4DPZ >> FUNcube Warehouse Developer >> >> On 20/02/2014 19:57, Bill Bordy, NJ1H wrote: >>> I need to do a sanity check of my reaction to the below. I took a deep >>> breath and waited awhile before sending this email >>> >>> Am I the only one wondering why any user felt the need to have a >>> column showing rankings added? >>> >>> 73, >>> Bill >>> NJ1H >>> >>> >>> On 2/20/2014 11:40 AM, David A B Johnson wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> At the request of several users we have added another column to the >>>> page which enumerates the position in the ranking as well as the >>>> number of uploads. >>>> >>>> http://warehouse.funcube.org.uk/ranking.html?satelliteId=2 >>>> >>>> Current range is 1 – 536 >>>> >>>> 73 >>>> >>>> Dave, G4DPZ >>>> >>>> FUNcube Team Member >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. >>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite >>>> program! >>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. >>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite >>> program! >>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb >> _______________________________________________ >> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! >> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb