STOP TALKING ABOUT NEW LANGUAGES... + Ocalm is crap, I don't know about the language, but I remember when I downloaded an ocalm program, it took me a day to compile it, compiler is crap, dependencies are crap, etc... don't know if it changes though... and anyways, we want to avoid new languages, right ? we want to keep the same team, not fire all devels and hire new ones who already know the language... if we go with a language that we don't all nkow well already, we'll end up with crap code, look at everyone's code when they first began.. look at ccmsn code, look at my own first code in amsn, it's all crap. We need experience in the languages...
KKRT On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 11:42:22 -0400, Boris Faure (aka billiob) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you want a "fast" language, use OCaml : > (http://caml.inria.fr/index.en.html) > I code with this language at school, and it's very funny and pleasant. > The code is also quite small; but it's not an easy language as python > or tcl. It can be compiled in native code or in bytecode. > > Well, stop talking about which is the best language. > > There is already a project for an msn client written in python : ask > Ole Andre Vadla Ravnas. > > 2006/6/2, Sander Hoentjen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 22:45 +0200, Harry Vennik wrote: >> > Yes, you may be right, be we also need to think about what we are >> going to do >> > ourselves. For that I think there is just: >> > - Tcl because we use that now, and we all know it >> > - C because it is the best programming language that compiles to >> native code >> And if I say Visual Basic is the best without backing that up, who of us >> would be right? Yes you say "is the best <> that compiles to native >> code", but you don't say why that is a good thing, or why it IS the >> best. >> > >> > I prefer C. >> That is a much better sentence then the one above. >> >> > >> > I've always disliked interpreted languages because of their lack of >> speed. >> > >> > And Youness: Java is faster than C for processing???? Benchmarks >> please :-P >> > >> > Harry >> >> >> P.S. reading back what i wrote it can be interpreted as a bit harsh, but >> it is not meant that way. I just mean to say everybody has a language of >> choice, and you have a high risk of saying that language is the best. >> When you do so please add "in my opinion" or a link to a benchmark (not >> that benchmarks mean a lot, since you can probably find a benchmark for >> any case you want) >> >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) >> >> iD8DBQBEf9q7ATrECtEe6c8RAlWZAKDry0IhQDH96VezgwGyE9X9uUopsgCg0Fuf >> SRhwf8XJevmgAdbmpHPCYDo= >> =qldQ >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Amsn-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel >> >> >> > > -- KaKaRoTo _______________________________________________ Amsn-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
