On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Aengus wrote: > > But I think the issue is somewhat moot - given that upwards of 1/3 of > all addresses fail to resolve, there isn't really that much point in > trying to pick up a handful of "slow" ip addresses by doing a second run > of lookups immediately after the first. >
Agreed. -- Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/ "This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01 +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this | mailing list, go to | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | List archives are available at | http://www.mail-archive.com/analog-help@lists.isite.net/ | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/ | http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7 +------------------------------------------------------------------------
