Zembower, Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aengus, thanks so much for your suggestion. Unfortunately, it doesn't > seem to work for me. I made these entries in my analog config file: > REFINCLUDE *.google.*,*.jhuccp.org*,*.yahoo.* > > SEARCHENGINE http://*.google.com/* q,as_q,as_oq,as_epq,query > SEARCHENGINE http://*.google.co.*/* q,as_q,as_oq,as_epq,query > SEARCHENGINE http://*.google.com.*/* q,as_q,as_oq,as_epq,query > > This generates this section in the '--settings' output: > Including (+) and excluding (-) the following referrers: > All excluded, then > + *.google.* > + *.jhuccp.org* > + *.yahoo.* > > This leads me to believe that it's working correctly. I wanted these > three referrers, because they make up most of my referrer report. > However, I get this output when I run analog: > ../analog-6.0/analog: analog version 6.0/Unix > ../analog-6.0/analog: Warning M: Logfile > /opt/analog/logdata/web1/access_log* > contains lines with no referrers, which are being filtered > (For help on all errors and warnings, see docs/errors.html) > ../analog-6.0/analog: Warning M: Logfile > /opt/analog/logdata/db/ccp-apps2/ex* > contains lines with no referrers, which are being filtered > sh: line 20: 19024 Segmentation fault ../analog-6.0/analog > +gweb1.analog.cfg > > This error message troubles me, as it seems to indicate that log > entries without referrers were being dropped. I'll have trouble > interepting this report, I think. Even if this report didn't seg > fault, I'm not sure it would be useful to me.
If you want to generate a Search Report, you might as well ignore lines without referrers, because the Search report information comes from the Referrer. (As a generale rule, the number of lines that have no referrer at all is usally pretty tiny - under normal circumstances, only bookmarks and e-mail links generate log entries with no referrer. 90% of the rest of the referrers will usually be "internal" - referrers from your own site). > Unless I or anyone else on this list can think of another suggestion, > I think that I just have two options: > 1) Add more memory to this host. You can test this very easily - exclude a couple of months from the report and see if you don't get the error when you're trying to generate a smaller report. > 2) Generate a report with just the Search Query and Search Word > sections, and minimize or eliminate everything else. Any guesses if > this would work? Sorry, I thought that you were already doing this. Yes - if you have to many logfiles to crunch in a single report, running seperate reports may allow you to get the information you need. I just turning off the other reports doesn't work, try to use the LOWMEM commands for everything except the referrers. Aengus +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------
