The final 100 may have been chosen, but there's really only one guy
writting that, and he's guessing.  I've had some back and forth with
him about why he feels like he needs to say that over and over with no
info, but that's a different topic.

Part of the reason for doing this contest is to get the developer
community excited about it, so I'd assume they would at least make the
reviewers look at all the apps.  We'll see.

Somebody pointed out that the FAQ says "Week of May 5", so in theory
there's a little over a week left.  Seems like a pretty short time,
though.

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:21 PM, cirion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  For better or worse, you aren't alone.  I'm seeing the same thing...
>  some spot check activity, but not a single real evaluation yet.
>
>  Hopefully we are both just unlucky, you twice for your two apps, and
>  the judges will be reviewing them at the very end.  That's why I get
>  nervous when I read that the final 100 have already been chosen.  If
>  that's true, and several apps were not actually evaluated, it would be
>  a huge disappointment.
>
>  - Chris
>
>  On May 1, 2:59 pm, everfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > I submitted two applications (completely working ones). One requires
>  > registration and then login, the other requires login with the userid
>  > and password provided in the readme document (for some security
>  > reason).
>  >
>  > In the past couple days, my server logs show some BRIEF accesses to
>  > the two applications. There are some ones registered and logged in the
>  > application ONE, but no one login the application TWO (or not login
>  > successfully, I do not know).
>  >
>  > It seems to me that whoever judges/tests the applications simply just
>  > did not read the readme document to get the userid/password to login
>  > the application TWO to see what the application really about.
>  >
>  > One thing I am 100% sure is that without login to Application TWO, no
>  > matter how smart/bright a judge is, s/he will not able to appreciate
>  > what the two applications are really about.
>  >
>  > Therefore, my concern is:
>  > Without knowing the judging process (spot check, or not, etc….), I
>  > even have not seen (based on my server log) any "judge" has made any
>  > reasonable judging/testing progress on my two applications yet so
>  > far.
>  >
>  > Just want to raise my concern now before it is too late.
>  >
>  > Winning the final 50 is great, but most people will not.
>  > However, most people (if not all) will feel calm and be respected if
>  > their hard-works have been judged/treated fairly and professionally.
>  >
>  > Suggestion:
>  > To make judging process OPEN:
>  > post info about what the judging processes are, and update overall
>  > status about the judging process daily (etc. spot checking day, detail
>  > checking day, etc….)
>  >
>  > To make judging process FAIR:
>  > Ensure judges have sufficient time to read the documents and run the
>  > applications to the level sufficient for judging the applications.
>  > (Without reading the document and without login to an application to
>  > try it at certain degree, it is definitely not sufficient to judge an
>  > application).
>  >
>  > Best
>  >
>  > Ever
>  >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to