Excellent. I could hardly stop laughing.
On May 2, 12:10 pm, "michael.novakjr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --the magic eight ball --
>
> don't be discouraged!
>
> www.youdidnotwin.com
>
> On May 1, 5:59 pm, everfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I submitted two applications (completely working ones). One requires
> > registration and then login, the other requires login with the userid
> > and password provided in the readme document (for some security
> > reason).
>
> > In the past couple days, my server logs show some BRIEF accesses to
> > the two applications. There are some ones registered and logged in the
> > application ONE, but no one login the application TWO (or not login
> > successfully, I do not know).
>
> > It seems to me that whoever judges/tests the applications simply just
> > did not read the readme document to get the userid/password to login
> > the application TWO to see what the application really about.
>
> > One thing I am 100% sure is that without login to Application TWO, no
> > matter how smart/bright a judge is, s/he will not able to appreciate
> > what the two applications are really about.
>
> > Therefore, my concern is:
> > Without knowing the judging process (spot check, or not, etc….), I
> > even have not seen (based on my server log) any “judge” has made any
> > reasonable judging/testing progress on my two applications yet so
> > far.
>
> > Just want to raise my concern now before it is too late.
>
> > Winning the final 50 is great, but most people will not.
> > However, most people (if not all) will feel calm and be respected if
> > their hard-works have been judged/treated fairly and professionally.
>
> > Suggestion:
> > To make judging process OPEN:
> > post info about what the judging processes are, and update overall
> > status about the judging process daily (etc. spot checking day, detail
> > checking day, etc….)
>
> > To make judging process FAIR:
> > Ensure judges have sufficient time to read the documents and run the
> > applications to the level sufficient for judging the applications.
> > (Without reading the document and without login to an application to
> > try it at certain degree, it is definitely not sufficient to judge an
> > application).
>
> > Best
>
> > Ever
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
