It's bizzare, they have designed a system for testing that cannot be used to accurately test an application's response!
The only solution is to publish an app that doesn't work and then fix it! What are they thinking? ARE they thinking? On Nov 5, 11:03 am, String <sterling.ud...@googlemail.com> wrote: > It's been disclosed on this forum before that test responses aren't > cached. I haven't looked into how that's implemented, but leaving > those extras blank would probably do it. So I suspect this is by > design. > > An obvious implication is that the test responses aren't an accurate > simulation of how your LVL implementation will work for real users; > unfortunate, but true. The usual advice is to set up another Google > account for testing, purchase your app from it (or not, depending on > what you're trying to test), and work with that. Seems kludgey, but > AFAIK that's the only way. > > String > > On Nov 3, 11:03 pm, Zsolt Vasvari <zvasv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > When I set the test response ro LICENSED in the Market for my app, I > > am not getting anything back in the "extras" field. I am referring to > > the VT, GT, GR fields. > > > Since I changed a lot in the LVL code, it's possible that I've broken > > it somehow, but I don't see any extras section right after > > unobfuscation, so I don't think that anything is wrong on my end. > > > I can see the reasoning behing the extras not being there if you > > specifally set a LICENSED response, but then how can I test that the > > extras stuff still works? If I set "Respond Normally", I got a > > NOT_LICENSED as I am not a buyer of my own app. > > > Thanks, > > Zsolt Vasvari > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
