By the way, I don't think your apparently shouldn't exist, I think there should be a way to extended system functionality in a secure way, and I don't think poor undocumented interfaces subject to change are the right way On Jul 27, 2012 10:05 AM, "Kristopher Micinski" <krismicin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I didn't say that was a security hole, but I believe you could. What I > said was bad was when an apparently could gain power over the system. > > AM polling is an option, but while it's a possible hack, they certainly > don't *want* this, hence lack of an API, you can see the lengthy > discussions as to the lack of a broadcast supporting this > On Jul 27, 2012 10:00 AM, "Pent" <supp...@apps.dinglisch.net> wrote: > >> > By the way, I think anyone at Google would argue this is a security >> hole, >> > so I'm not alone >> >> They seem to allow services to do virtually anything that an activity >> can do at virtually any time. Doesn't seem to me they consider it a >> security hole. >> >> My app is called Tasker. It uses ActivityManager polling, which I >> detest. >> >> Pent >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Android Developers" group. >> To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
