App, not apparently, I have an overzealous autocorrect On Jul 27, 2012 10:13 AM, "Kristopher Micinski" <krismicin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> By the way, I don't think your apparently shouldn't exist, I think there > should be a way to extended system functionality in a secure way, and I > don't think poor undocumented interfaces subject to change are the right way > On Jul 27, 2012 10:05 AM, "Kristopher Micinski" <krismicin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I didn't say that was a security hole, but I believe you could. What I >> said was bad was when an apparently could gain power over the system. >> >> AM polling is an option, but while it's a possible hack, they certainly >> don't *want* this, hence lack of an API, you can see the lengthy >> discussions as to the lack of a broadcast supporting this >> On Jul 27, 2012 10:00 AM, "Pent" <supp...@apps.dinglisch.net> wrote: >> >>> > By the way, I think anyone at Google would argue this is a security >>> hole, >>> > so I'm not alone >>> >>> They seem to allow services to do virtually anything that an activity >>> can do at virtually any time. Doesn't seem to me they consider it a >>> security hole. >>> >>> My app is called Tasker. It uses ActivityManager polling, which I >>> detest. >>> >>> Pent >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Android Developers" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
