Feel free to use 
http://andappstore.com/AndroidPhoneApplications/licensing.jsp

As I understand things the Device ID in 4(c)(ii) should be unique for 
netbooks, phones, etc. because it's described as "The Android ID (a 
unique 64-bit value) as a hex string."

Al.
http://andappstore.com/

Sena Gbeckor-Kove wrote:
> The problem is the scammers not the legitimate customers. I'm  
> considering creating a licenseing library so that people can't just  
> use the app after having cancelled the transaction. Once that's done  
> I'll be happy. Problem is I'm creating a productivity app that I'd  
> like to be able to run on netbooks as well and I don't want to use the  
> IMEI code to calculate my license since its not guaranteed to be on  
> non phone devices.
>
> S
>
>
> On 24 Feb 2009, at 03:43, Semprebon wrote:
>
>   
>> You know, as a potential buyer of apps, a 24 hour return period seems
>> pretty reasonable, even a little short, to me. Maybe if your app can't
>> hold the customer's attention for that long, its not worth paying for
>> in the first place...
>>
>> On Feb 22, 6:12 pm, JP <joachim.pfeif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> On Feb 22, 1:23 pm, Java Developer <supp...@cyntacks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Al,
>>>>         
>>>> We finally made the decision to pull the plug too.
>>>>         
>>> I wonder how pro's that build things from scratch (i.e. do not
>>> leverage existing back ends such as Weather Channel, Amazon etc.)
>>> would sign up to the platform in an effort to build innovative apps.
>>> Technically, Android has the capabilities and "best in class" up  
>>> front
>>> effort and cost.
>>>
>>> It can be frustrating at times, to say the least. I backed off  
>>> quite a
>>> bit ever since the Google team wasn't able or willing to disperse the
>>> allegations that the ADC1 was extended to allow the MIT team to  
>>> submit
>>> and take a price. I sure did not consider quitting my day job.
>>> Learning about pretty significant issues like the sidetracked SDK
>>> releases in the ADC1 or the launch of paid apps through off-hand
>>> remarks in the WSJ is <you fill the blank>.
>>> Poor relationship building.
>>>
>>> ** Google I/O coming. Opportunity to fix the relationship with the
>>> developer community **
>>>
>>>       
>
>
> >
>   


-- 

* Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ *

======
Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the 
company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House, 
152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK. 

The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not 
necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's 
subsidiaries.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to