Was able to build 2.3 on a 32bit machine with jdk 1.6 on ubuntu 10.10. Need to check but think I build generic-eng Tried 64bit but this resulted in errors. Some source is build 32bit but the linker wants to use 64bit lib's.
2010/12/22 張惟婷 <tt90...@gmail.com>: > I use JDK 1.6 > > 2010/12/22 hedwin <hedwin.kon...@gmail.com> >> >> meant so say: It might or might not be related but which java sdk do you >> use? >> >> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:14 AM, hedwin <hedwin.kon...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I might or might not be related but which java sdk do you use? >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 7:07 AM, wei-ting Chang <tt90...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> sorry, I have a problem >> >> ---------------------------------------- >> >> target Java: Camera (out/target/common/obj/APPS/Camera_intermediates/ >> >> classes) >> >> packages/apps/Camera/src/com/android/camera/ui/GLRootView.java:41: >> >> cannot access javax.microedition.khronos.egl.EGLConfig >> >> bad class file: javax/microedition/khronos/egl/EGLConfig.class(javax/ >> >> microedition/khronos/egl:EGLConfig.class) >> >> unable to access file: corrupted zip file >> >> Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of >> >> the classpath. >> >> import javax.microedition.khronos.egl.EGLConfig; >> >> ^ >> >> make: *** [out/target/common/obj/APPS/Camera_intermediates/classes- >> >> full-debug.jar] Error 41 >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> >> Can anyone help me? >> >> >> >> On 12月22日, 上午3時44分, G2 <grego...@gentil.com> wrote: >> >>> Correct for the first part. I forget to mention it. >> >>> >> >>> For the second point, I actually started to do the same but when I saw >> >>> a lot of "-m64" reference everywhere, I considered the sed as a little >> >>> bit more "dangerous" (even if you do -name *.mk). Imagine that you >> >>> have a file named *-m64* and it's called in an Android.mk file... >> >>> >> >>> Thanks for the contribution! >> >>> >> >>> Grégoire >> >>> >> >>> On Dec 20, 6:21 pm, Hemanth <hemanth....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > Hi, >> >>> >> >>> > The patch below is nice! >> >>> >> >>> > Some additional information. >> >>> > 1. we have to comment out the error statement in main.mk(just added >> >>> > for the sake of being complete). >> >>> > build/core/main.mk:80 >> >>> > $(warning >> >>> > ************************************************************) >> >>> > -$(error stop) >> >>> > +#$(error stop) >> >>> >> >>> > 2. I use a slightly different way to change the flags. It's not >> >>> > better >> >>> > or worse, just an alternative. >> >>> > I think clearsilver code is not updated so frequently, so the patch >> >>> > should be enough. But I tend to keep misplacing the patch file. >> >>> > Running the below command is slower, but it ignores possible line >> >>> > number changes. >> >>> >> >>> > In ANDROID_ROOT: >> >>> > $find . -name '*.mk' | xargs sed -i 's/-m64//g' >> >>> >> >>> > On Dec 21, 4:01 am, G2 <grego...@gentil.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > > The following patch works for me in order to compile Gingerbread >> >>> > > on a >> >>> > > 32-bit machine: >> >>> >> >>> > > --- a/external/clearsilver/java-jni/Android.mk 2010-12-20 >> >>> > > 09:30:02.379792000 -0800 >> >>> > > +++ b/external/clearsilver/java-jni/Android.mk 2010-12-20 >> >>> > > 02:20:58.871792000 -0800 >> >>> > > @@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ >> >>> > > LOCAL_CFLAGS += -fPIC >> >>> >> >>> > > # This forces a 64-bit build for Java6 >> >>> > > -LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64 >> >>> > > -LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64 >> >>> > > +#LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64 >> >>> > > +#LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64 >> >>> >> >>> > > LOCAL_NO_DEFAULT_COMPILER_FLAGS := true >> >>> >> >>> > > --- a/external/clearsilver/cgi/Android.mk 2010-12-20 >> >>> > > 09:30:11.115792000 -0800 >> >>> > > +++ b/external/clearsilver/cgi/Android.mk 2010-12-20 >> >>> > > 02:24:39.711792000 -0800 >> >>> > > @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ >> >>> > > LOCAL_CFLAGS := -fPIC >> >>> >> >>> > > # This forces a 64-bit build for Java6 >> >>> > > -LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64 >> >>> > > -LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64 >> >>> > > +#LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64 >> >>> > > +#LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64 >> >>> >> >>> > > LOCAL_NO_DEFAULT_COMPILER_FLAGS := true >> >>> >> >>> > > --- a/external/clearsilver/cs/Android.mk 2010-12-20 >> >>> > > 09:30:20.419792000 >> >>> > > -0800 >> >>> > > +++ b/external/clearsilver/cs/Android.mk 2010-12-20 >> >>> > > 02:24:48.375792001 >> >>> > > -0800 >> >>> > > @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ >> >>> > > LOCAL_CFLAGS := -fPIC >> >>> >> >>> > > # This forces a 64-bit build for Java6 >> >>> > > -LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64 >> >>> > > -LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64 >> >>> > > +#LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64 >> >>> > > +#LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64 >> >>> >> >>> > > LOCAL_NO_DEFAULT_COMPILER_FLAGS := true >> >>> >> >>> > > --- a/external/clearsilver/util/Android.mk 2010-12-20 >> >>> > > 09:32:13.415792001 -0800 >> >>> > > +++ b/external/clearsilver/util/Android.mk 2010-12-20 >> >>> > > 02:24:56.767792001 -0800 >> >>> > > @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ >> >>> > > LOCAL_CFLAGS := -fPIC >> >>> >> >>> > > # This forces a 64-bit build for Java6 >> >>> > > -LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64 >> >>> > > -LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64 >> >>> > > +#LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64 >> >>> > > +#LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64 >> >>> >> >>> > > LOCAL_NO_DEFAULT_COMPILER_FLAGS := true >> >>> >> >>> > > Grégoire >> >>> >> >>> > > On Dec 20, 12:35 am, G2 <grego...@gentil.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > > > At least, it's successfully compiling on a 64-bit machine. Good >> >>> > > > work >> >>> > > > Google! >> >>> >> >>> > > > Hopefully, there will be less pain for a full upgrade compared >> >>> > > > to >> >>> > > > eclair->froyo as the jump doesn't seem to be as high on the >> >>> > > > backend >> >>> > > > side... >> >>> >> >>> > > > Grégoire >> >>> >> >>> > > > On Dec 19, 8:38 pm, G2 <grego...@gentil.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > > > > And no need to try to bypass the rule! You really need a >> >>> > > > > 64-bit >> >>> > > > > machine, >> >>> >> >>> > > > > Grégoire >> >>> >> >>> > > > > On Dec 19, 8:37 pm, G2 <grego...@gentil.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > > > > > =========================================== >> >>> > > > > > PLATFORM_VERSION_CODENAME=REL >> >>> > > > > > PLATFORM_VERSION=2.3.1 >> >>> > > > > > TARGET_PRODUCT=generic >> >>> > > > > > TARGET_BUILD_VARIANT=eng >> >>> > > > > > TARGET_SIMULATOR= >> >>> > > > > > TARGET_BUILD_TYPE=release >> >>> > > > > > TARGET_BUILD_APPS= >> >>> > > > > > TARGET_ARCH=arm >> >>> > > > > > HOST_ARCH=x86 >> >>> > > > > > HOST_OS=linux >> >>> > > > > > HOST_BUILD_TYPE=release >> >>> > > > > > BUILD_ID=GINGERBREAD >> >>> > > > > > ============================================ >> >>> > > > > > Checking build tools versions... >> >>> > > > > > build/core/main.mk:76: >> >>> > > > > > ************************************************************ >> >>> > > > > > build/core/main.mk:77: You are attempting to build on a >> >>> > > > > > 32-bit system. >> >>> > > > > > build/core/main.mk:78: Only 64-bit build environments are >> >>> > > > > > supported >> >>> > > > > > beyond froyo/2.2. >> >>> > > > > > build/core/main.mk:79: >> >>> > > > > > ************************************************************ >> >>> > > > > > build/core/main.mk:80: *** stop. Stop. >> >>> >> >>> > > > > > Does Google have a partnership with Intel to force everybody >> >>> > > > > > to >> >>> > > > > > upgrade their machine? ;-) :-( >> >>> >> >>> > > > > > Grégoire >> >> >> >> -- >> >> unsubscribe: android-porting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> >> website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting >> >> >> > > > -- unsubscribe: android-porting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting
