Any help ? I am also facing same issue.

Thanks
Amit.

On Dec 22 2010, 11:07 am, wei-ting Chang <tt90...@gmail.com> wrote:
> sorry, I have a problem
> ----------------------------------------
> target Java: Camera (out/target/common/obj/APPS/Camera_intermediates/
> classes)
> packages/apps/Camera/src/com/android/camera/ui/GLRootView.java:41:
> cannotaccessjavax.microedition.khronos.egl.EGLConfig
> bad classfile: javax/microedition/khronos/egl/EGLConfig.class(javax/
> microedition/khronos/egl:EGLConfig.class)unabletoaccessfile:corruptedzipfile
> Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of
> the classpath.
> import javax.microedition.khronos.egl.EGLConfig;
>                                      ^
> make: *** [out/target/common/obj/APPS/Camera_intermediates/classes-
> full-debug.jar] Error 41
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Can anyone help me?
>
> On 12月22日, 上午3時44分, G2 <grego...@gentil.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Correct for the first part. I forget to mention it.
>
> > For the second point, I actually started to do the same but when I saw
> > a lot of "-m64" reference everywhere, I considered the sed as a little
> > bit more "dangerous" (even if you do -name *.mk). Imagine that you
> > have afilenamed *-m64* and it's called in an Android.mkfile...
>
> > Thanks for the contribution!
>
> > Grégoire
>
> > On Dec 20, 6:21 pm, Hemanth <hemanth....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hi,
>
> > > The patch below is nice!
>
> > > Some additional information.
> > > 1. we have to comment out the error statement in main.mk(just added
> > > for the sake of being complete).
> > > build/core/main.mk:80
> > > $(warning
> > > ************************************************************)
> > > -$(error stop)
> > > +#$(error stop)
>
> > > 2. I use a slightly different way to change the flags. It's not better
> > > or worse, just an alternative.
> > > I think clearsilver code is not updated so frequently, so the patch
> > > should be enough. But I tend to keep misplacing the patchfile.
> > > Running the below command is slower, but it ignores possible line
> > > number changes.
>
> > > In ANDROID_ROOT:
> > > $find . -name '*.mk' | xargs sed -i 's/-m64//g'
>
> > > On Dec 21, 4:01 am, G2 <grego...@gentil.com> wrote:
>
> > > > The following patch works for me in order to compile Gingerbread on a
> > > > 32-bit machine:
>
> > > > --- a/external/clearsilver/java-jni/Android.mk  2010-12-20
> > > > 09:30:02.379792000 -0800
> > > > +++ b/external/clearsilver/java-jni/Android.mk  2010-12-20
> > > > 02:20:58.871792000 -0800
> > > > @@ -34,8 +34,8 @@
> > > >  LOCAL_CFLAGS += -fPIC
>
> > > >  # This forces a 64-bit build for Java6
> > > > -LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64
> > > > -LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64
> > > > +#LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64
> > > > +#LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64
>
> > > >  LOCAL_NO_DEFAULT_COMPILER_FLAGS := true
>
> > > > --- a/external/clearsilver/cgi/Android.mk       2010-12-20
> > > > 09:30:11.115792000 -0800
> > > > +++ b/external/clearsilver/cgi/Android.mk       2010-12-20
> > > > 02:24:39.711792000 -0800
> > > > @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
> > > >  LOCAL_CFLAGS := -fPIC
>
> > > >  # This forces a 64-bit build for Java6
> > > > -LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64
> > > > -LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64
> > > > +#LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64
> > > > +#LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64
>
> > > >  LOCAL_NO_DEFAULT_COMPILER_FLAGS := true
>
> > > > --- a/external/clearsilver/cs/Android.mk        2010-12-20 
> > > > 09:30:20.419792000
> > > > -0800
> > > > +++ b/external/clearsilver/cs/Android.mk        2010-12-20 
> > > > 02:24:48.375792001
> > > > -0800
> > > > @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
> > > >  LOCAL_CFLAGS := -fPIC
>
> > > >  # This forces a 64-bit build for Java6
> > > > -LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64
> > > > -LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64
> > > > +#LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64
> > > > +#LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64
>
> > > >  LOCAL_NO_DEFAULT_COMPILER_FLAGS := true
>
> > > > --- a/external/clearsilver/util/Android.mk      2010-12-20
> > > > 09:32:13.415792001 -0800
> > > > +++ b/external/clearsilver/util/Android.mk      2010-12-20
> > > > 02:24:56.767792001 -0800
> > > > @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
> > > >  LOCAL_CFLAGS := -fPIC
>
> > > >  # This forces a 64-bit build for Java6
> > > > -LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64
> > > > -LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64
> > > > +#LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64
> > > > +#LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64
>
> > > >  LOCAL_NO_DEFAULT_COMPILER_FLAGS := true
>
> > > > Grégoire
>
> > > > On Dec 20, 12:35 am, G2 <grego...@gentil.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > At least, it's successfully compiling on a 64-bit machine. Good work
> > > > > Google!
>
> > > > > Hopefully, there will be less pain for a full upgrade compared to
> > > > > eclair->froyo as the jump doesn't seem to be as high on the backend
> > > > > side...
>
> > > > > Grégoire
>
> > > > > On Dec 19, 8:38 pm, G2 <grego...@gentil.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > And no need to try to bypass the rule! You really need a 64-bit
> > > > > > machine,
>
> > > > > > Grégoire
>
> > > > > > On Dec 19, 8:37 pm, G2 <grego...@gentil.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > ===========================================
> > > > > > > PLATFORM_VERSION_CODENAME=REL
> > > > > > > PLATFORM_VERSION=2.3.1
> > > > > > > TARGET_PRODUCT=generic
> > > > > > > TARGET_BUILD_VARIANT=eng
> > > > > > > TARGET_SIMULATOR=
> > > > > > > TARGET_BUILD_TYPE=release
> > > > > > > TARGET_BUILD_APPS=
> > > > > > > TARGET_ARCH=arm
> > > > > > > HOST_ARCH=x86
> > > > > > > HOST_OS=linux
> > > > > > > HOST_BUILD_TYPE=release
> > > > > > > BUILD_ID=GINGERBREAD
> > > > > > > ============================================
> > > > > > > Checking build tools versions...
> > > > > > > build/core/main.mk:76:
> > > > > > > ************************************************************
> > > > > > > build/core/main.mk:77: You are attempting to build on a 32-bit 
> > > > > > > system.
> > > > > > > build/core/main.mk:78: Only 64-bit build environments are 
> > > > > > > supported
> > > > > > > beyond froyo/2.2.
> > > > > > > build/core/main.mk:79:
> > > > > > > ************************************************************
> > > > > > > build/core/main.mk:80: *** stop.  Stop.
>
> > > > > > > Does Google have a partnership with Intel to force everybody to
> > > > > > > upgrade their machine? ;-) :-(
>
> > > > > > > Grégoire- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
unsubscribe: android-porting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting

Reply via email to