Oh yeah, ubuntu (32 and 64) was running in virtualbox 2010/12/22 hedwin <hedwin.kon...@gmail.com>: > Was able to build 2.3 on a 32bit machine with jdk 1.6 on ubuntu 10.10. > Need to check but think I build generic-eng > Tried 64bit but this resulted in errors. Some source is build 32bit > but the linker wants to use 64bit lib's. > > > 2010/12/22 張惟婷 <tt90...@gmail.com>: >> I use JDK 1.6 >> >> 2010/12/22 hedwin <hedwin.kon...@gmail.com> >>> >>> meant so say: It might or might not be related but which java sdk do you >>> use? >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:14 AM, hedwin <hedwin.kon...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > I might or might not be related but which java sdk do you use? >>> > >>> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 7:07 AM, wei-ting Chang <tt90...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> >> sorry, I have a problem >>> >> ---------------------------------------- >>> >> target Java: Camera (out/target/common/obj/APPS/Camera_intermediates/ >>> >> classes) >>> >> packages/apps/Camera/src/com/android/camera/ui/GLRootView.java:41: >>> >> cannot access javax.microedition.khronos.egl.EGLConfig >>> >> bad class file: javax/microedition/khronos/egl/EGLConfig.class(javax/ >>> >> microedition/khronos/egl:EGLConfig.class) >>> >> unable to access file: corrupted zip file >>> >> Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of >>> >> the classpath. >>> >> import javax.microedition.khronos.egl.EGLConfig; >>> >> ^ >>> >> make: *** [out/target/common/obj/APPS/Camera_intermediates/classes- >>> >> full-debug.jar] Error 41 >>> >> >>> >> -------------------------------------------------- >>> >> Can anyone help me? >>> >> >>> >> On 12月22日, 上午3時44分, G2 <grego...@gentil.com> wrote: >>> >>> Correct for the first part. I forget to mention it. >>> >>> >>> >>> For the second point, I actually started to do the same but when I saw >>> >>> a lot of "-m64" reference everywhere, I considered the sed as a little >>> >>> bit more "dangerous" (even if you do -name *.mk). Imagine that you >>> >>> have a file named *-m64* and it's called in an Android.mk file... >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks for the contribution! >>> >>> >>> >>> Grégoire >>> >>> >>> >>> On Dec 20, 6:21 pm, Hemanth <hemanth....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> > The patch below is nice! >>> >>> >>> >>> > Some additional information. >>> >>> > 1. we have to comment out the error statement in main.mk(just added >>> >>> > for the sake of being complete). >>> >>> > build/core/main.mk:80 >>> >>> > $(warning >>> >>> > ************************************************************) >>> >>> > -$(error stop) >>> >>> > +#$(error stop) >>> >>> >>> >>> > 2. I use a slightly different way to change the flags. It's not >>> >>> > better >>> >>> > or worse, just an alternative. >>> >>> > I think clearsilver code is not updated so frequently, so the patch >>> >>> > should be enough. But I tend to keep misplacing the patch file. >>> >>> > Running the below command is slower, but it ignores possible line >>> >>> > number changes. >>> >>> >>> >>> > In ANDROID_ROOT: >>> >>> > $find . -name '*.mk' | xargs sed -i 's/-m64//g' >>> >>> >>> >>> > On Dec 21, 4:01 am, G2 <grego...@gentil.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > > The following patch works for me in order to compile Gingerbread >>> >>> > > on a >>> >>> > > 32-bit machine: >>> >>> >>> >>> > > --- a/external/clearsilver/java-jni/Android.mk 2010-12-20 >>> >>> > > 09:30:02.379792000 -0800 >>> >>> > > +++ b/external/clearsilver/java-jni/Android.mk 2010-12-20 >>> >>> > > 02:20:58.871792000 -0800 >>> >>> > > @@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ >>> >>> > > LOCAL_CFLAGS += -fPIC >>> >>> >>> >>> > > # This forces a 64-bit build for Java6 >>> >>> > > -LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64 >>> >>> > > -LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64 >>> >>> > > +#LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64 >>> >>> > > +#LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64 >>> >>> >>> >>> > > LOCAL_NO_DEFAULT_COMPILER_FLAGS := true >>> >>> >>> >>> > > --- a/external/clearsilver/cgi/Android.mk 2010-12-20 >>> >>> > > 09:30:11.115792000 -0800 >>> >>> > > +++ b/external/clearsilver/cgi/Android.mk 2010-12-20 >>> >>> > > 02:24:39.711792000 -0800 >>> >>> > > @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ >>> >>> > > LOCAL_CFLAGS := -fPIC >>> >>> >>> >>> > > # This forces a 64-bit build for Java6 >>> >>> > > -LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64 >>> >>> > > -LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64 >>> >>> > > +#LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64 >>> >>> > > +#LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64 >>> >>> >>> >>> > > LOCAL_NO_DEFAULT_COMPILER_FLAGS := true >>> >>> >>> >>> > > --- a/external/clearsilver/cs/Android.mk 2010-12-20 >>> >>> > > 09:30:20.419792000 >>> >>> > > -0800 >>> >>> > > +++ b/external/clearsilver/cs/Android.mk 2010-12-20 >>> >>> > > 02:24:48.375792001 >>> >>> > > -0800 >>> >>> > > @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ >>> >>> > > LOCAL_CFLAGS := -fPIC >>> >>> >>> >>> > > # This forces a 64-bit build for Java6 >>> >>> > > -LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64 >>> >>> > > -LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64 >>> >>> > > +#LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64 >>> >>> > > +#LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64 >>> >>> >>> >>> > > LOCAL_NO_DEFAULT_COMPILER_FLAGS := true >>> >>> >>> >>> > > --- a/external/clearsilver/util/Android.mk 2010-12-20 >>> >>> > > 09:32:13.415792001 -0800 >>> >>> > > +++ b/external/clearsilver/util/Android.mk 2010-12-20 >>> >>> > > 02:24:56.767792001 -0800 >>> >>> > > @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ >>> >>> > > LOCAL_CFLAGS := -fPIC >>> >>> >>> >>> > > # This forces a 64-bit build for Java6 >>> >>> > > -LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64 >>> >>> > > -LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64 >>> >>> > > +#LOCAL_CFLAGS += -m64 >>> >>> > > +#LOCAL_LDFLAGS += -m64 >>> >>> >>> >>> > > LOCAL_NO_DEFAULT_COMPILER_FLAGS := true >>> >>> >>> >>> > > Grégoire >>> >>> >>> >>> > > On Dec 20, 12:35 am, G2 <grego...@gentil.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > At least, it's successfully compiling on a 64-bit machine. Good >>> >>> > > > work >>> >>> > > > Google! >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > Hopefully, there will be less pain for a full upgrade compared >>> >>> > > > to >>> >>> > > > eclair->froyo as the jump doesn't seem to be as high on the >>> >>> > > > backend >>> >>> > > > side... >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > Grégoire >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > On Dec 19, 8:38 pm, G2 <grego...@gentil.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > And no need to try to bypass the rule! You really need a >>> >>> > > > > 64-bit >>> >>> > > > > machine, >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > Grégoire >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > On Dec 19, 8:37 pm, G2 <grego...@gentil.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > > =========================================== >>> >>> > > > > > PLATFORM_VERSION_CODENAME=REL >>> >>> > > > > > PLATFORM_VERSION=2.3.1 >>> >>> > > > > > TARGET_PRODUCT=generic >>> >>> > > > > > TARGET_BUILD_VARIANT=eng >>> >>> > > > > > TARGET_SIMULATOR= >>> >>> > > > > > TARGET_BUILD_TYPE=release >>> >>> > > > > > TARGET_BUILD_APPS= >>> >>> > > > > > TARGET_ARCH=arm >>> >>> > > > > > HOST_ARCH=x86 >>> >>> > > > > > HOST_OS=linux >>> >>> > > > > > HOST_BUILD_TYPE=release >>> >>> > > > > > BUILD_ID=GINGERBREAD >>> >>> > > > > > ============================================ >>> >>> > > > > > Checking build tools versions... >>> >>> > > > > > build/core/main.mk:76: >>> >>> > > > > > ************************************************************ >>> >>> > > > > > build/core/main.mk:77: You are attempting to build on a >>> >>> > > > > > 32-bit system. >>> >>> > > > > > build/core/main.mk:78: Only 64-bit build environments are >>> >>> > > > > > supported >>> >>> > > > > > beyond froyo/2.2. >>> >>> > > > > > build/core/main.mk:79: >>> >>> > > > > > ************************************************************ >>> >>> > > > > > build/core/main.mk:80: *** stop. Stop. >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > > Does Google have a partnership with Intel to force everybody >>> >>> > > > > > to >>> >>> > > > > > upgrade their machine? ;-) :-( >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > > Grégoire >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> unsubscribe: android-porting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>> >> website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting >>> >> >>> > >> >> >
-- unsubscribe: android-porting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting
