----- Original Message ----- From: "Wouter Zoons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Matthias Bohlen'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Chad Brandon'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 1:48 PM Subject: RE: [Andromda-devel] MMFs: The final battle continues!
> It seems to work this time (locally I took all cartridges except meta > and bpm4struts from the build process and still need to fix the > bpm4struts code) > > Some comment though: > > 1. do we really want to prefix our interfaces with 'I', Visual > Age/Eclipse style ? I think we should stick to the widely accepted > standard of placing a suffix on the implementation classes with 'Impl' > > You expose an object through an interface, why change the name of that > object when it is passed as an interface ? Shouldn't the interface have > the cleanest name of them all ? I completely agree, I would prefere this also...I don't particular like the 'I' in front of interfaces. Can we change this Matthias? > > 2. I need to put the 'facades', 'facade-impls' and 'facade-interfaces' > outlets in the build.xml where I use the andromda task... I was > wondering what the first one is needed for > > thanks > > Wouter > > > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Andromda-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-devel
