Hi all,
good idea! The class in the facade model should be called "cleanly",
i.e. "Classifier". The interface should also be called "Classifier", the
facade could be called "ClassifierFacade" and the implementation
"ClassifierFacadeImpl". I completely agree with that.
Wouter: yes, we can leave out the "I" if we name the classes like Chad
suggested!
Wouter: the three outlets are for interfaces ("facade-interfaces"),
generated implementations ("facades") and hand-written implementations
("facade-impls").
It's good to have three pairs of eyes... :-)
Matthias
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Chad Brandon
> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 9:06 PM
> To: Wouter Zoons; 'Matthias Bohlen'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Andromda-devel] MMFs: The final battle continues!
>
>
> Matthias,
>
> Could we give the interfaces the "clean" name (i.e. the
> actual facade name), since that is the one people are going
> to be working with. And name the generated facade
> decorators: <some facade name>Decoractor and then the impl of
> the facade decorator <some facade name>DecoratorImpl? I
> think that would be easier to understand (since the names are
> more descriptive of what they
> are) and really the generated decorator shouldn't be even
> seen..its the interfaces that should be documented/used.
> What do you say?
>
> Chad
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wouter Zoons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Matthias Bohlen'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Chad
> Brandon'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 1:48 PM
> Subject: RE: [Andromda-devel] MMFs: The final battle continues!
>
>
> > It seems to work this time (locally I took all cartridges
> except meta
> > and bpm4struts from the build process and still need to fix the
> > bpm4struts code)
> >
> > Some comment though:
> >
> > 1. do we really want to prefix our interfaces with 'I', Visual
> > Age/Eclipse style ? I think we should stick to the widely accepted
> > standard of placing a suffix on the implementation classes
> with 'Impl'
> >
> > You expose an object through an interface, why change the
> name of that
> > object when it is passed as an interface ? Shouldn't the interface
> > have the cleanest name of them all ?
>
> >
> > 2. I need to put the 'facades', 'facade-impls' and
> 'facade-interfaces'
> > outlets in the build.xml where I use the andromda task... I was
> > wondering what the first one is needed for
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Wouter
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
> Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
> a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Andromda-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Andromda-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-devel
