Koen Kooi wrote: > I think going back to the good-old "dumping untested stuff in releases" I would vote for it.
> would actually be an improvement over the current mentor apathy. I have only one spitz (terrier) machine and I want to have it usable. Testing new image needs a lot of time for re-customizing them for my needs. That is why I don't volunteer to become a spitz mentor. I am using OE.dev for a longer time and I don't want to return to 2007.12. In past half year I did not see an image that does not boot. On the other hand, in past half year I did not see an image that boots seamlessly (Xfbdev and udev problems). I build my own tree for my experiments (see link below). I can eventually upload my images (and update proposed work-arounds on the wiki) to the server and save your CPU time. >Unless someone can come up with something that garantees at least one >person has tested it before dumping it online. Referring to "last successfully tested version" on wiki, where anybody can update the info. -- Stanislav Brabec http://www.penguin.cz/~utx/zaurus/software _______________________________________________ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
