I'm lost! I've got my SL-C3000 useable (Thanks Stanislav!), but how many machines is Angstrom trying to support now?
I just get the feeling at the moment that Angstrom is a build of OpenEmbedded, and that build seems to be forking in many directions. I look at the feeds and see some software works on some units, but not on others. I've tried my damnedest to get a build enviro working right for Spitz, but just lack some guidance. Stanislav has given a lot of his time in pvt mails which I appriciate, but I end up wondering if this is going anywhere? Maybe I have Distro fatigue? I've mentioned this before, but maybe if there was a focus on a core group of software, that gave people a useable machine that would sync with a desktop for contacts etc, we might start to get a bigger core of people to Angstrom. In essence, is it worth staying with Angstrom? What is the target userbase? Thanks, Ian 2008/9/5 Paul Eggleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Wednesday 03 September 2008, Koen Kooi wrote: > > I think going back to the good-old "dumping untested stuff in releases" > > would actually be an improvement over the current mentor apathy. > > Having just had a response from Paul S. it would seem that all of his > machines > are no longer "mentored" either due to lack of time, unless someone else > steps up. So your plan gets +1 from me, although some testing would be very > helpful if there are people around willing to test. > > Cheers, > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list > Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel > _______________________________________________ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
