Just to be clear, the -04 version already published does *not* deal with the comments in my review of -03: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/QCgeaEDFQlEgX_JsWzzjdWRNoHo
Regards Brian On 01/08/2017 19:23, Sheng Jiang wrote: > Hi, all > > We received no negative response to the WGLC on > draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-03 during the two-week WGLC and we did > receive good reviews through the WG document stage, through the shepherd > review process and WGLC period. Considering the past history of this work, I, > with my ANIMA chair cap on, feel it is has passed the WGLC and should > advance. This conclusion is made with the condition that the authors would > solve the comments received during the WGLC and these modifications were not > substantial changes from 03 version. If there are big changes, a shorter > second WGLC may be needed. > > Up to now, there is no IPR disclosure linked to this document. > > Once the update is published and it meets the above condition, for which the > second WGLC is not needed, as the document shepherd, I will finalize the > shepherd document and send the document on. > > Best regards, > > Sheng (co-chair, Toerless who as a co-author stayed neutral on the content > side) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > Anima@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
