Yes, this is a glitch. Good catch. I think it's editorial so it can be fixed easily, but IANA does need to be informed. The phrasing in the ACP draft is fine:
The IANA is requested to register the value "xxx" (without quotes) to the GRASP Objectives Names Table in the GRASP Parameter Registry. The specification for this value is this document, Section yyy. Regards Brian On 07-Nov-20 05:24, Toerless Eckert wrote: > *sigh* > > Am i completeley confused, or did we miss until now the IANA request in BRSKI > for > the new entries AN_Proxy and AN_join_registrar ? > > I was just checking IANA actions for ACP and did not see these two in the > GRASP > registry: > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-44.txt > > Not sure about the process, e.g.: if "specification required" (GRASP > registry) > mandates the IANA text in the BRSKI RFC... I fear it does ? If three is an > easier > way as having Warren approve another rev... ? > > Cheers > Toerless > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
