Ok, if you are certain that we can do this in AUTH48, then the following will suffice:
https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/issues/147 If not, then let me know what i should do process wise (author or wg-chair). Cheers Toerless On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 08:51:28AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Yes, this is a glitch. Good catch. I think it's editorial so it can be fixed > easily, but IANA does need to be informed. The phrasing in the ACP draft is > fine: > > The IANA is requested to register the value "xxx" (without quotes) to the > GRASP Objectives Names Table in the GRASP Parameter Registry. The > specification for this value is this document, Section yyy. > > Regards > Brian > > On 07-Nov-20 05:24, Toerless Eckert wrote: > > *sigh* > > > > Am i completeley confused, or did we miss until now the IANA request in > > BRSKI for > > the new entries AN_Proxy and AN_join_registrar ? > > > > I was just checking IANA actions for ACP and did not see these two in the > > GRASP > > registry: > > > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-44.txt > > > > Not sure about the process, e.g.: if "specification required" (GRASP > > registry) > > mandates the IANA text in the BRSKI RFC... I fear it does ? If three is an > > easier > > way as having Warren approve another rev... ? > > > > Cheers > > Toerless > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Anima mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima > > -- --- [email protected] _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
