Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote: > Which gets us back to the case you mention, which is one and the same vendor > (shudder) reusing serial numbers.
> a) Are we aware of any actual instance of this ?
Yes... the bigger the org, the less anyone has any idea what's going on
globally.
And then add in mergers/acquisitions.
> If something like this would be a stupid but possible case, then
> i would like us to write somehing short about this into rfc8366bis
> so readers can understand why this differentiation by KeyIdentifier
> may be useful to have.
I agree that we could clarify the use of this field.
One thing that I don't like is that it's hard to write/edit/revise the
"description" field in the YANG, and more and more, I'd like to just say,
"See RFCXXXX section Y.Z" in the description.
That might not fly as a process.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
