Esko Dijk <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI I just added an interpretation #3 to the Github issue which seems > to be the right one! Per RFC 5280, any X.509 certificate extension is > encoded in an OCTET STRING named "extnValue" as part of the "Extension" > ASN.1 item.
> So this seems what was meant with "Authority Key Identifier OCTET
> STRING" in RFC 8366 -> "Authority Key Identifier extension OCTET STRING
> (i.e. the extnValue)"
Worthwhile clarifying in constrained-voucher.
Should it also be an errata against RFC8366?
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
