Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > In other words, the method of bulk transfer described in > draft-ietf-anima-grasp-distribution at Section 4.3 "Bulk Information > Transfer" could be improved by first negotiating a larger message size > than the default 2048 bytes. That might improve efficiency for > distributing large files. (All it really changes in a GRASP > implementation over TLS or TCP is the buffer sized set in two or three > socket recv() calls.)
Could the receiving end of the transfer simply declare their maximum in the F_NEG or something like that? -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
