On 27-Jul-21 14:32, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > > In other words, the method of bulk transfer described in > > draft-ietf-anima-grasp-distribution at Section 4.3 "Bulk Information > > Transfer" could be improved by first negotiating a larger message size > > than the default 2048 bytes. That might improve efficiency for > > distributing large files. (All it really changes in a GRASP > > implementation over TLS or TCP is the buffer sized set in two or three > > socket recv() calls.) > > Could the receiving end of the transfer simply declare their maximum in the > F_NEG or something like that?
I'm tempted to try implementing something before answering. I have a little toy that I use to move files between machines on my desktop via GRASP, and I think I will play with that when I have some time. Brian _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
