So, congratulations on this RFC. Should ANIMA consider an incompatible update 
to RFC8992 to use these new CBOR tags instead of the existing ad hoc solution?

I don't think we have an installed base to worry about, and the difference for 
an implementor is not very big.

Regards
   Brian

On 14-Dec-21 12:36, [email protected] wrote:
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

RFC 9164

         Title:      Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)
                     Tags for IPv4 and IPv6 Addresses
                     and Prefixes
         Author:     M. Richardson,
                     C. Bormann
         Status:     Standards Track
         Stream:     IETF
         Date:       December 2021
         Mailbox:    [email protected],
                     [email protected]
         Pages:      10
         Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

         I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-13.txt

         URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9164

         DOI:        10.17487/RFC9164

This specification defines two Concise Binary Object Representation
(CBOR) tags for use with IPv6 and IPv4 addresses and prefixes.

This document is a product of the Concise Binary Object Representation 
Maintenance and Extensions Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
   https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to [email protected].  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to