Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > So, congratulations on this RFC. Should ANIMA consider an incompatible > update to RFC8992 to use these new CBOR tags instead of the existing ad > hoc solution?
Maybe. I'm not sure.
I will see about adapting my implementation and post a further opinion.
> I don't think we have an installed base to worry about, and the
> difference for an implementor is not very big.
Yes, that's true. On the other hand, I'd hardly like to encourage IPv4 ACPs.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
