(Sheng's new email puts html in both the text/html and the text/plain parts)
>>>>> "SJ" == Michael Richardson <nbsp> writes:
SJ> In general, I don't have preference whether this document of
SJ> rfc8366bis defines YANG components. The major differency would be
SJ> rfc8366bis would depend on the brski-prm document. That could means
SJ> rfc8366bis could not be published as RFC until brshi-prm published.
This is not a *preference* question, it's a quesiton of YANG mechanisms.
What we were doing was NOT going to work, and I feel that we avoided a major
issue by catching this now.
Andy has weighed in to both tell us we don't have to do it this way, and also
to say that we do have to do that. I conclude that we have not had enough
review from sufficiently invested YANG experts.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
