Sheng Jiang <shengji...@bupt.edu.cn> wrote:
> This message starts the two-week (*) ANIMA Working Group Last Call to
> advance draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06, which specifies enhancements to
> BRSKI (RFC8995) to facilitate bootstrapping in domains featuring no or
> only time limited connectivity between a pledge and the domain
Hi, please be aware that the YANG components of this will be moved to
rfc8366bis. They are already in the rfc8366bis-05, but I don't yet feel
that we have *WG* Consensus to do this.
Toerless has asked me to regurgitate the entire discussion, again, which I
think that I won't do.
> If you do not feel this document should advance, please state
> your reasons why
So, as much as I'd like it to advance, I don't think it can advance until we
agree what to do with the YANG.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
