Add the "result" label into the mail title in order to emphasis the right 
purpose.

Regards,

--------------



Sheng Jiang



>During the WGLC period, this drafts has received no objections, but comments. 
>Therefore, the chairs would draw on a passed conclusion . The WG discussed the 
>authors' suggestion that move the YANG components of this to



>rfc8366bis and reach the consensus to respect the authors' choice. The authors 
>please submit an update version. Then, the document shepherd can move it 
>forward.



>



>Regards,



>



>



>--------------



>



>



>



>Sheng Jiang



>



>



>



>>Dear ANIMAers,



>



>



>



>>



>



>



>



>>This message starts the two-week (*) ANIMA Working Group Last Call to advance 
>>draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06, which specifies enhancements to BRSKI 
>>(RFC8995) to facilitate bootstrapping in domains featuring no or only time 
>>limited connectivity between a pledge and the domain registrar. This 
>>document's intended status is Standards Track. At present, there is no IPR 
>>filed against this document. This document has been ANIMA WG document since 
>>October, 2021 and has received a lot of feedback from the WG and work from 
>>its authors. The authors therefore think is ready for WGLC. Please send your 
>>comments by Feb. 15th 2023. If you do not feel this document should advance, 
>>please state your reasons why. Matthias Kovatsch is the assgined 
>>document shepherd.



>



>



>



>>



>



>



>



>>



>



>



>



>>Regards, 



>



>



>



>>



>



>



>



>>



>



>



>



>>Sheng



>



>



>_______________________________________________



>Anima mailing list



>Anima@ietf.org



>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima



>


_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to