Dear Sheng,
On behalf of the co-authors, i would hereby like to ask for adoption of
draft-eckert-anima-brski-discovery.
The draft is not about new, not-yet-adopted work, but instead it is coalescing
discovery options that we originally had started to write into different BRSKI
variation
documents:
draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm
draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae
draft-ietf-anima-brski-constrained-voucher
draft-ietf-anima-brski-constrained-proxy
During the work on the discovery text for those drafts in the past year, it
became
obvious that there was a lot of overlap and more text than woudl reasonably
make sense
in every individual variation when it had to be duplicated across so many
drafts.
We already have precedence of moving out text from one adopted ANIMA RFC into
another
and adopting the second without another adoption call
(draft-ietf-anima-brski-async-enroll-03 ->
draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-00), and i think the same process would equally be
appropriate here,
but if you think we need an adoption call, then i would like to ask for one on
behalf of
the co-authors.
Also, i think we had good discussion about the document during IETF118, in our
side meetings and on the mailing list:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?q=%22draft-eckert-anima-brski-discovery%22
Thank you!
Toerless
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
