There is a reasonable good foundation for this document giving it is coalesced from parts of several relevant WG documents. I will launch the adoption call soon.
Sheng JIANG >Dear Sheng, > >On behalf of the co-authors, i would hereby like to ask for adoption of >draft-eckert-anima-brski-discovery. > >The draft is not about new, not-yet-adopted work, but instead it is coalescing >discovery options that we originally had started to write into different BRSKI >variation >documents: > > draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm > draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae > draft-ietf-anima-brski-constrained-voucher > draft-ietf-anima-brski-constrained-proxy > >During the work on the discovery text for those drafts in the past year, it >became >obvious that there was a lot of overlap and more text than woudl reasonably >make sense >in every individual variation when it had to be duplicated across so many >drafts. > >We already have precedence of moving out text from one adopted ANIMA RFC into >another >and adopting the second without another adoption call >(draft-ietf-anima-brski-async-enroll-03 -> >draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-00), and i think the same process would equally be >appropriate here, >but if you think we need an adoption call, then i would like to ask for one on >behalf of >the co-authors. > >Also, i think we had good discussion about the document during IETF118, in our >side meetings and on the mailing list: > >https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?q=%22draft-eckert-anima-brski-discovery%22 > >Thank you! > Toerless > >_______________________________________________ >Anima mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
