Hi, Brian, > How does GRASP interwork with the NETCONF/YANG approach to network management? > ... if ANIMA doesn't answer it soon, we will not see much progress.
I fully agree. > It seems time for ANIMA to focus on that, as the current batch of BRSKI-related > work is getting mature. This does not have to wait after BRSKI. Actually, these request different expertise. As long as we have participants who want to work on them, ANIMA WG should support. Best regards, Sheng > -----Original Message----- > From: Anima <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter > Sent: Friday, May 3, 2024 3:52 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Anima] GRASP, NETCONF and YANG > > Seeing Toerless's comments on > draft-ietf-anima-network-service-auto-deployment reminded me of what I > think is the largest unsolved issue in the GRASP model. How does GRASP > interwork with the NETCONF/YANG approach to network management? > > I don't really know how to answer this, but if ANIMA doesn't answer it soon, > we will not see much progress. The question is a bit similar to how GRASP > interworks with DNS-SD, but there we have a proposal already. > > It seems time for ANIMA to focus on that, as the current batch of BRSKI-related > work is getting mature. > > Regards > Brian Carpenter > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
