Esko Dijk <[email protected]> wrote: >> Does the manufacturer-private satisfy your need here?
> Yes, this looks fine. The issue of "hidden communication channel" that
> was raised for this field, would equally be there for standardized
> extensions that import from other YANG modules. E.g. I can always find
> a bstr field from some arbitrary other YANG module, use it as
> extension, and store my hidden data in there.
I noticed btw, that there was no SID allocation for manufacturer-private in
the document. I will fix that in the next few days. I made something up for
the slides :-)
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
