Hi Michael, Ok. Will hold the document in that state.
In the meantime, please work on addressing the outstanding DISCUSS and COMMENT. Thanks. > On Apr 19, 2025, at 12:50 PM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > [email protected] wrote: >> One of them is that Mahesh can decide to hold the document and formally >> approve it only, e.g., when a sign of stability of the bis is shown >> (e.g., the bis is out of the WG). > > Sure, I have no problem with that. > > Probably better that they stick around just after IESG Approved, but not yet > into rfc > queue. Easier to throw a patch here and there based upon other document > review. Better to be there than MISSREF. > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
