Thank Tim for the re-review.

Tim Wicinski via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote:
    > ### 1.1 Terminology

    > You define Value Added Reseller (VAR), which is all well and good, but
    > there are more than one place where you say "value added reseller
    > (VAR)" where VAR should work, and you fail to capitalize the term in
    > those places.

    > I may be overly OCD, but any reason why terms are not sorted
    > alphabetically?

Huh... it looks alphabetical to me: EST, Local, Manufacturer, Owner, OEM, 
Provisional...

ah, so OEM < Owner. fixed.
moved Cloud VAR Registrar to be in the Cs, rather than amended VAR.

    > You define "Manufacturer", and explain the various nuances, but you
    > don't always capitalize the term in the document.

I've upcased them all, but not sure they all should be.

    > ### Referencing

    > In Russ Housley's GENART review, he called out how you use different
    > ways of referencing sections of an RFC, using both "Section X of [RFC]"
    > and "[RFC], Section X".  I feel the authors should pick one (the
    > former) and be consistent.

fixed to always use the kramdown mechanism.
I assumed RPC would decided upon a consistent view.
There are some places where it's Section X and Y of [Z], and I left it that way.

moving this up away from the nits:
    > The two figures are very nice, but I would argue they should be placed
    > after each paragraph describing them, rather together.  But I may be
    > wrong.

So you'd move them out of the Architecture which is trying to explain why
there are different requirements, into the Protocol solution?
You aren't wrong.  I don't know, because I know the document too well.
Section 4 also has more detailed time-sequence diagrams.

changes at:
   https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/pull/246

    > These are all spelling/grammar/nits
    > ### 1. Introduction

    > s/are required which/are required, which/
    > s/provision products to be operate/provision products to operate/

okay.

    > ### 2 Architecture

    > s/For use case one/For the first use case/
    > s/For use case two/For the second use case/

fixed

    > ### 2.1 Network Connectivity

    > s/accomplish this, from routable IPv4 or IPv6 addresses/accomplish
    > this, from using routable IPv4 or IPv6 addresses/

fixed.

    > ### 3.2.  Cloud Registrar Processes Voucher Request Message

    > s/redirect to owner EST/redirect to Owner EST/

fixed.

    > ### 4.2.  Bootstrap via Cloud Registrar and Owner EST Service

    > s/attempts to authentiate/attempts to authenticate/

    > s/In step 3, the the Cloud Registrar/In step 3, the Cloud Registrar/

fixed.

    > ### 8.2.  Trust Anchors for Cloud Registrar

    > s/is described in in / is described in /

fixed.

    > ### 1.2.  Target Use Cases

    > s/bootstraps it should be redirected/bootstraps, it should be
    > redirected/

    > s/procedures define/procedures defined/

fixed.

    > ### 7.1.  Captive Portals

    > s/all connections is also deployed./all connections are also deployed./

fixed.

    > 8.  Security Considerations

    > s/operation of the MASA also apply to operation/
        operation of the MASA also apply to the operation/

fixed

    > ### 8.2.  Trust Anchors for Cloud Registrar

    > s/need to include enough trust anchor/need to include enough trust
    > anchors/

fixed.


--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to