Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > moving this up away from the nits: >> > The two figures are very nice, but I would argue they should be >> placed > after each paragraph describing them, rather together. But I >> may be > wrong. >> >> So you'd move them out of the Architecture which is trying to explain >> why there are different requirements, into the Protocol solution? You >> aren't wrong. I don't know, because I know the document too well. >> Section 4 also has more detailed time-sequence diagrams. >> >> > Actually, more like putting each one after each paragraph in the > Architecture section which describes them. "For use case one, ...." > then the diagram. Same for "For use case two...."
> does that make more sense? it's a six of one and when I was reviewing
> it just the back and forth could be avoided some. I will go with
> whatever the consensus says.
I've moved the architecture diagrams up to the spot where they are first
introduced. That meant moving a bit more text around.
It's an update to the PR.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
