Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
    > Makes sense to me. An alternative would be fe80::, which is a valid LL
    > address, if any client is likely to check the format.

But fe80::0 is, I think, a valid address, isn't it?
... checks 4291. All zeroes InterfaceID is not excluded as far as I can tell.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to