On 18-Sep-25 09:39, Michael Richardson wrote:
Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> Makes sense to me. An alternative would be fe80::, which is a valid LL
> address, if any client is likely to check the format.
But fe80::0 is, I think, a valid address, isn't it?
... checks 4291. All zeroes InterfaceID is not excluded as far as I can tell.
It's the default interface index according to RFC 4007. So it should never
correspond to anything real.
Brian
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
