Hi, all, We received no negative response to the WGLC on
draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-14 during the two-week WGLC and we did receive good
reviews through the WG document stage (started from Feb 2022) and WGLC period.
Esko Dijk has provided a good review and a few enhancement suggestions. The
author shall make an update accordingly.Overall, considering the past history
of this work, I, with my ANIMA chair cap on, feel it has passed the WGLC and
should be advanced, on the considition that Esko's review comments has been
properly addressed in -15 version. If the modification was maginificate, the
second WGLC might be needed. Sheng Jiang is the assigned document
shepherd. I will wait till -15 version are confirmed by Esko. Up to now, there
is no IPR disclosure to this document. Best regards, Sheng
Sheng JIANG<[email protected]> On Wednesday,
Sept 24, 2025, 11:47 wrote:
Dear ANIMAers, This message starts the two-week (*) ANIMA Working Group Last
Call to advance draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-14, which updates RFC8366 that
defines a strategy to securely assign a Pledge to an owner using an artifact
signed, directly or indirectly, by the Pledge's manufacturer.. This document's
intended status is Standards Track. At present, there is no IPR filed against
this document. This document has been ANIMA WG document since February, 2022
and has received a lot of feedback from the WG/reviewers and work from its
authors. The authors therefore think is ready for WGLC. Please send your
comments by October 7th， 2025. If you do not feel this document should advance,
please state your reasons why. For now, I will be the document shepherd,
although the chairs encourage volunteers. Regards, Sheng for the chairs_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
