Sheng JIANG <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, all, We received no negative response to the WGLC on > draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-14 during the two-week WGLC and we did > receive good reviews through the WG document stage (started from Feb > 2022) and WGLC period. Esko Dijk has provided a good review and a few > enhancement suggestions. The author shall make an update > accordingly.Overall, considering the past history of this work, I, with > my ANIMA chair cap on, feel it has passed the WGLC and should be > advanced, on the considition that Esko's review comments has been > properly addressed in -15 version. If the modification was > maginificate, the second WGLC might be needed. Sheng Jiang is the > assigned document shepherd. I will wait till -15 version are confirmed > by Esko. Up to now, there is no IPR disclosure to this document. Best > regards, Sheng
We double checked on Tuesday of this week that -17 has all of the changes Esko asked for. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
