> -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(concat between your original mail and your previous reply..sorry I got lost between mails) >> I don't get it. Why trax ? or why trax only should I say. >> What do you plan to do when a task depends on say trax AND bsf ? >There is no such case, inquire when it happens. 8-) May I ask what you have in mind exactly ? If you do this for trax t [... optional-xxx.jar ...] > Are there any better names? As mentioned by Henri, ant-tasks-xxx might be better than 'optional' > What is that going to do to Stephane's diagnostics stuff? Should I > keep the package version information in optional-nodeps' MANIFEST > only? mmm.. no idea, but we just can throw it away if we change the way it's packaged. Currently the verification was just checking for the core and optional package. If we change this, I'm not sure how we can enforce a version check for each task 'jar' except that maybe when loading the task from a given package we do a version check... > Also I may need a little help with selectors: Don't know much about selectors, sorry. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
