On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the risk of becomming more of a pest that I am > already are, the backward compatibility aregument is > complete crap. > What is wrong with that? except for the last words above, nothing. As long as the option to use a different classloader mechanism is an option and not the default, there is no backwards compatibility problem. This has been stated many times, BTW. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
