Since they're self-hosted now, I'd say yes. And given the fact that it supports rename and move, it would be perfect for a highly changeable repo, which Ant2 is likely to be at first, and for refactorings.
Somebody who knows Karl Fogel could ask him whether it was feasible and/or desirable. --DD -----Original Message----- From: Diane Holt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:56 PM To: Ant Developers List Subject: RE: what I want to see in the next version of ant --- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I strongly agree with Craeg, on both the separate repository (isn't > subversion close enough that it could be a SVN repo ;-) Cool idea. Last time I checked, I think they were scheduled to go beta in August (but I could be wrong). Not sure if all the features they want to have will be in it at that point, but I'm assuming at the very least atomic changes will be. Diane -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
