Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since they're self-hosted now, I'd say yes. And given the fact that it > supports rename and move, it would be perfect for a highly changeable repo, > which Ant2 is likely to be at first, and for refactorings. > > Somebody who knows Karl Fogel could ask him whether it was feasible and/or > desirable. --DD
Oh -- I just saw this on another list, and sent the response below, which would have been more appropriately sent to you folks in the first place: --------------------8-<-------cut-here---------8-<----------------------- This doesn't conflict with an existing Makefile system, it just sits parallel to -- and independent of -- the Makefile stuff, right? (I'm unfortunately Ant-ignorant, due only to lack of time not lack of interest.) I think someone *did* submit an Ant task at one point; I'm not sure what came of that. I'll ping the list again, but first will wait for answer to the above question, so I don't make nonsense on the list :-). -Karl -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
